Yes, there are significant reasons for caution when it comes to acquiring drones from Non-EU manufacturers.

1. Data Sovereignty and IT Security

Many Non-EU drone systems rely on closed software architectures and proprietary cloud services operated outside Europe. This can expose sensitive data – such as video or mapping imagery – to third-party access. For police, rescue, or government agencies, this represents a serious security risk.

2. Dependence on Non-European Supply Chains

Hardware, software, and spare parts are fully dependent on suppliers outside the EU. In times of crisis or geopolitical tension, updates, parts, or service could be restricted or withheld, threatening the operational readiness of critical authorities.

3. Lack of Transparency and Control

With many foreign systems, access to source code, communication protocols, or security architectures is not possible. This prevents effective security audits and the closure of potential vulnerabilities – a serious concern for cybersecurity and data protection.

4. Strategic Procurement Policy

Public procurement has a model function. By prioritizing European solutions, authorities strengthen technological sovereignty, local innovation, and long-term supply resilience. Public purchasing decisions can actively support the growth of a strong and secure European drone industry.

Conclusion

While Non-EU drones may appear cost-effective in the short term, they pose long-term risks to security, privacy, and sovereignty. European alternatives offer greater transparency, integration capability, and independence – contributing to a sustainable and trustworthy technological foundation for Europe.